23 Apr 2009 @ 8:26 PM 
 

Jeff Britting on Ayn Rand’s portrayal in Wolff’s “Old School”

 

I just came back from the “Meeting Frost, Hemingway, and Rand” panel discussion. The purpose of the event was to discuss the three authors portrayed in Tobias Wolff’s “Old School.”

Jeff Britting did a great job. When it was his turn to speak about Ayn Rand’s character in “Old School” by Tobias Wolff, he nailed it. Britting started by stating that Wolff’s presentation of Ayn Rand was a “total distortion,” among other words, and then went on in detail to explain who she was, the themes of her four fiction books, and a little bit of her philosophy. Near the end of his presentation he compared Wolff’s “character that shares Ayn Rand’s name” with the actual Ayn Rand and showed a few specific cases where the two are polar opposites. He also asked the audience to not take his presentation or Wolff’s presentation of Ayn Rand on faith by reading Rand’s books for themselves.

Britting’s presentation of Ayn Rand was everything Wolff’s was not. While Wolff presentation Ayn Rand as a mean, dismissive, and rude woman that no rational person would want to be around (except for her dark-clothes-wearing acolytes), Britting presented an intelligent woman who took ideas and her writing seriously. And he did it in a way that would leave someone who knew little about her with a desire to want to know more.

The panel also included a speaker for Robert Frost and a speaker for Ernest Hemingway, and both got a fair amount of time. I think Ayn Rand was the focus of the evening, however. Perhaps I’m a little biased in making that judgement, but the majority of the questions were about Ayn Rand and the more interesting responses seemed to come from Britting.

The surprise of the evening for me was a student who read a few passages from Atlas Shrugged. Before each speaker a student came on stage and read a few passages from that particular writer. The student who was tasked with Ayn Rand’s work came up with three great passages: one from Dagny’s first ride on the John Galt Line, one from the Francico’s money speech, and another from John Galt’s speech. The passages she picked were just perfect, and it was heartening to see them read to the audience.

The panel was taped with two cameras, and one of the camera operaters told me after the event that there might be a chance the video could be released online. I’ll keep my eye out and see what happens.

Overall, it was a great night! Thanks to Jeff Britting for making the trip all the way out to Kansas City. We don’t get events like this very often!

Tags Tags: , ,
Categories: Blog
Posted By: Darren
Last Edit: 23 Apr 2009 @ 08 26 PM

E-mailPermalink
 

Responses to this post » (2 Total)

 
  1. Burgess Laughlin said...
    2:34 am - April 24th, 2009

    1. Your report is very clear. It describes the overall event and Jeff Britting’s inspiring role in it. You have skill at picking a few points that, taken together, sketch the subject quickly. As a result I know that such an even happened and that there is good news in it, too. Thank you.

    2. > “Perhaps I’m a little biased . . . .”

    I realize you made this statement casually, perhaps wryly, but I think it brings up an important point.

    Bias is a mental condition in which a value held in the subconscious might lead a person who does not supremely value objectivity to make a judgment not supported logically by facts of the case being judged.

    My approach is this: If anyone thinks I am biased, the burden of proof is on them to both define “bias” and to prove it exists in a particular case.

    I am still wrestling somewhat with this concept — one often used by irrationalists to undermine speakers talking about their own fields or other interests. I welcome correction or other discussion.

    Again, thank you for the article.

  2. Darren said...
    6:02 am - April 24th, 2009

    Thank you for the comment, Burgess.

    I thought about what you said about bias during my commute in to work this morning, and now I agree you. I wrote that statement without a lot of thought (which is a problem itself), as if I were talking to a friend. But the truth is, my statement was based on facts that I observed accurately (such as seeing the majority of questions directed at Jeff Britting). There’s nothing to be gained by undercutting what I say as I say it.

    The only thing I should admit to when it comes to my ability to judge that evening is the fact that I had a little trouble following the other two speakers. Part of it was the fact that I wasn’t incredibly interested, and the other part was the fact that they weren’t as direct and to-the-point as the discussion about Ayn Rand. Even the literature that was read aloud for Hemingway and Frost didn’t have the same directness as the selections from Atlas Shrugged. Perhaps those with more experience in the works of Hemingway or Frost have a better context in which to judge the discussion, but I didn’t get it. But if I don’t get it, I don’t think the “average” person is going to get it, either.

    Thanks again for your comments, Burgess!

 

Leave A Comment ...

 

 XHTML:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
\/ More Options ...
Change Theme...
  • Users » 1
  • Posts/Pages » 188
  • Comments » 168
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid
  • LifeLife « Default
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LiteLight
  • No Child Pages.
  • No Child Pages.
  • No Child Pages.